The creation vs. evolution debate is a very hot topic these days. This debate is splattered across the internet. School teachers now teach evolution as fact. The nightly news, and all the major media magazine's report on evolution and TOE (theory of evolution) as fact; period. Most college professor's also teach evolution. Creationism nor God is never mentioned in any of the curriculum. Creation nor God is even a viable option. According to the evolutionist; the verdict is in. Evolution is a fact. I originally thought that the title of this paper was a little harsh. However, after reading the information contained on this website and others; I think that you will agree that evolution is a lie. It is not a misunderstanding, ignorance etc... It is a lie. Those who champion evolution are atheist (99.9%). The theory of evolution (TOE) should really be called the theory of atheism (TOA). It is obvious to any investigator that evolution and the theory of evolution is an attempt by the atheist to justify his unbelief in the creator. As you will see, this is an agenda by/for the atheist cause. If you claim to be a Christian, I urge you to reconsider accepting evolution. This line of thinking is very dangerous. You cannot have your cake and eat it to. Do not cave in to the atheist/evolutionist. They have no evidence for evolution. NONE. Not too long ago I got into a debate/discussion with an atheist/evolutionist. After stumbling across his web site, I wrote him to discuss the purpose of his website. His website was devoted exclusively to atheism, evolution and not only his disbelief in God, but also included his hatred for Jesus Christ. Now I know we are all allowed to voice or opinions. I realize that we live in a free country. The majority of pro evolution web sites are operated by devout atheist. These atheist sites spit out more misinformation, twisted logic and down right ignorance; when it comes to science, Biblical text, history and even the definition of simple words like "theory". Some of these sites seem upon arrival to be an area where a debate can take place. However the major ones are heavily biased towards the atheist/evolutionist world view. If you disagree with the view of those running these sites, expect your email box to be loaded with verbal attacks reminiscent of kindergarten playground antics. If they do post your response to there site, they always have the last word and they always will claim that you do not understand and you really need to visit this page or that page, so you will understand better. An atheist/evolutionist always has to have the last word. In scouring the world wide web, everytime a creationist comments on anything, it always seems that the atheist/evolutionist will respond, then the creationist will respond to the response. Usually this is due to the fact the the atheist/evolutionist didn't even grasp what the creationist was saying. Then the atheist/evolutionist always has to respond again. Because he/she knows he has not convinced anyone for his argument. So the creationist usually does not respond to the second response. And after reading about 3 or 4 dozen of these exchanges, I can honestly say, I can't blame them. Evolutionist argue "sideways". They never have any evidence for the main topic. A perfect example of this would be Edward E. Max, Richard Dawkins or Stephen J. Gould. These three have done more damage for the evolutionist cause than all the ignorant people on the web. And it is hard to beat the ignorance flowing out of the major atheist/evolutionist website, yet they are able to do it. Every time one of these two men speak, it is just another nail in the evolution coffin. I would now like to thank all three of them. They have opened more eyes to the evolution hoax, than any website possibly could. They have shown how twisted thought process's work. And someone who really knows the difference between fact and fiction can spot it immediately. They are the three wise men of evolution. Yet the evolutionist camp latches on to everything these three men say.(Also see The Santa Similarity) Another atheist/evolutionist argument is the claim that creation scientist never publish there work; that creation scientist only use the web and other means to make there case. The problem stems from the atheist/evolutionist. All of the major science magazines are ran by pro-evolutionist. The creation scientist would love to publish there work in these magazines. The magazines will not accept them nor will they publish them. I tried to remain open minded when viewing the scientific data associated with evolution and the theory of evolution. Yet after viewing so much of the evidence for evolution that is not evidence at all, and realizing that they are not talking about facts, but addressing theories only, conclusions must be made. However in every instance that a discussion is started, the pro-evolutionist begins his barrage of assaults on everything. The first mode of attack is usually "you do not understand" or "that is very old data" or "you are arguing about something that does not exist, due to the fact that you do not understand evolution". The reason for this line of defense is due to the evolutionist way of thinking. The evolutionist thinks that "you couldn't possibly understand, because if you did understand then that means that he/she could be wrong, and that is impossible". With this line of thinking it is just about impossible to argue intelligently with an atheist/evolutionist. Below is an example of how an evolutionist responded to the beginning of the universe. Now please keep in mind that evolutionist have absolutely no concrete evidence for the beginning of the universe. The evolutionist only has a theory. The evolutionist claims that they have enough evidence to prove the beginning of the universe. Notice how the evolutionist wants proof of the existence of God. However the evolutionist/atheist does not require the same criteria for the existence of evolution. Reliance on an omnipotent being. These argument both assume the existence of God. If you personally accept that God exists, this is fine, but to be credible scientific theories it becomes necessary to demonstrate that God exists and is capable of performing this act of creation.Let's take this same statement and change the words "God" and "Evolution" and "omnipotent being" with "The Theory of Evolution". Notice how when we apply the same rules to the evolutionist argument, or shall I say a level playing field, the atheist argument is put in its proper perspective. Reliance on The Theory of Evolution. These argument both assume the existence of Evolution. If you personally accept that Evolution exists, this is fine, but to be credible scientific theories it becomes necessary to demonstrate that Evolution exists and is capable of performing this act of Evolution This is a prime example of the evolutionist circle of thinking. In most cases you will find the evolutionist way of thinking on par with the little boy who was caught with his hand in the cookie jar. He can deny the obvious, yet he was caught. This is the atheist problem. Using intelligent reasoning when confronting a evolutionist, stops them dead in the water. Please keep in mind that penning an evolutionist down on actual concrete evidence (this is highly recommended) will result in the evolutionist probably saying that there is just too much evidence for him to present in the time allotted, when in fact, he doesn't have much evidence at all. What he does have is weak, and he knows it. That's why he will avoid presenting it at almost any cost. That's why it will be up to you to force the discussion. Make the evolutionist address the issues. The Evolutionist's Defense The evolutionist knows he can't win a scientific debate of the theory. His only hope is to divert the discussion to something else. He will likely use some personal attacks. He will question your real motives for doubting evolution. He will attack the credibility of any authorities you cite (and some you didn't cite). He will attempt to get you to defend yourself, defend the authorities he has maligned, or attack him. If he can get you to do any of these things, he has achieved his objective (which is to avoid talking about the theory of evolution). The evolutionist will probably try to bring religion into the discussion. There are two reasons for this. First, if he can change the subject to an irrelevant discussion of how many animals could have been on Noah's Ark, he doesn't have to talk about evolution. Second, it seems relevant to him because he probably believes in evolution mainly because he doesn't believe in Noah's Ark. He doesn't have any good reason for believing in evolution. But creation and evolution are the only two explanations for the origin of life. If he doesn't believe one, he must believe the other. He believes in evolution by default, not because there is strong evidence to support it. He thinks the only way he can win is to make creation look even less plausible than evolution. If there were a good defense of the theory of evolution, someone would have published it by now. The evolutionist could simply recite that defense. But since there isn't a good defense of the theory of evolution, his best strategy is to change the subject. Any objective examination of the fossil record is devastating to the theory of evolution. Only fertile imagination and belief in innumerable missing links makes the theory of evolution even remotely possible. The theory of evolution has to be believed in spite of the fossil record, not because of it. Evolutionists don't want any honest investigation of the theory of evolution. That's why they use the court system to keep any reference to the problems with the theory of evolution out of the public school science books. If the theory of evolution had nothing to hide, then evolutionists would not need the courts to protect it. The truth about evolution is getting out. Parents are responding by putting their children in private schools, or home-schooling their children, so that their children can get a good science education. As these children grow up and take their place in society as geologists, biologists, and astronomers, unfettered by the fairy-tale "facts" told by evolutionists, they will make progress in these fields equal to the progress made in engineering and computer science. The Real Motive If you are a Christian, you know the capabilities of Satan. The atheist/evolutionist does not believe in either. Using scripture as a defensive weapon against an atheist is fruitless. The atheist hates scripture being quoted to him. Scripture holds no water to him/her. Although we must use the Bible as a weapon against the evolution propaganda machine, don't expect too many atheist/evolutionist to reach reality. The question is why could someone believe the evolution story? There is only one answer. Deception. Who is the deceiver? Who else but Satan. This (evolution) is Satan's master plan. If he can convince enough people that creation is a joke, then his harvest of souls is maximized. If he succeeds in this, he would have removed God from the mind of millions. Evolutionist are pushing this for one purpose. What is there purpose? The same as Satan's. To remove God, to teach that you do not need God. Without a moral compass, the atheist/evolutionist would be capable of living out his/her world view without the guilt of doing anything wrong. If you think your child is going to school and getting an unbiased account of the beginning of the universe, you better think again. When I went to school, I was taught evolution. No mention of God. My defense was I never paid attention in school (science, and biology anyway). I let most of the evolution spin roll off my back. Back then I did not see the relationship that evolution had on the fact of creation. So your children are being taught evolution. They are being brainwashed so to speak. Yet as you will see on this web page; they have been given misinformation, hearsay and down right lies. If you do not believe this; ask your child about the beginning of the universe. Ask him/her how man came into existence. Be prepared to counter the claims of evolution. Some of you may be thinking that I am overreacting, or a Bible thumping nut. Please if you feel this way, investigate this debate yourself. If God is taken out, what next. Science is not the law. There are scientist (hundreds) who have abandoned the theory of evolution and evolution in general. The pro-evolutionist will deny this, yet it is fact. This is another fact that is suppressed. Once you understand the real motive for pushing evolution; maybe just maybe those who have never grasped the power of Satan, will be able to make the connection he has to this issue. You need to quite sitting on your duff. There are thousands and thousands of souls who have bought the evolution fairy tale hook, line and sinker. They are either questioning the existence of God, or have already dismissed God. If someone does not bring the facts to the surface, then what path do we expect these people to take? What!?!?!?!? There are some people who claim to be Christian AND believe in evolution. This line of thinking is ridiculous. If any rational thought was used in this line of thinking, one would see how this could not be. God created man in his own image. So to believe in evolution; you have to accept one of two facts. Either God is a single cell, or God is an ape like creature. God has not changed. I will not go into all the scripture that states this fact. There are several. If you believe in evolution or God made the big bang and then let the chips fall where they may (Evolution), then the Bible is a lie, Adam and Eve could not have existed, and our God is a liar and cannot be trusted. Think... God IS NOT a liar. We humans have a hard time grasping things. Simply because we do not understand everything, and science is trying to prove it's agenda, does not mean we accept the first thing that "seems" plausible. If you want physical proof then you are out of luck. We are not talking just in the physical. This is a spiritual issue. You cannot argue spiritual things in the physical realm, if one of the people in the discussion, is not spiritual. Atheist do not even grasp the spiritual realm. This is obvious by reading the information they put out. It is especially amusing to read an atheist discussing the supposed contradictions in the Bible. It takes more faith to believe evolution than it does to believe that Jesus Christ physically and spiritually rose from the dead. Dismissing that God created the heavens and the earth and all living things, as stated in Genesis, by accepting evolution is calling God a liar.
Lies, Ignornace, Deception and ... Another ploy the atheist/evolutionist uses is the age of the universe. Pro evolutionist science claims that star xyz is billions of light years away. Since light travels at x speed, this means that it has x million of years for the light from star xyz to be visible here on earth. This would mean that the universe is x million of years old at a minimum. I cannot quote the atheist who claimed this but, the claim was "you can not tell me that God would speed up the light to reach earth and do this to confuse us, this is not a rational claim. God could not/would not be able to alter the natural laws(?)" First of all here was an atheist telling me what God is capable of. By making such statements just cements the fact that atheist/evolutionist will not accept any opposition's argument. They think they are right by default. The atheist/evolutionist has not/can not grasp the concept of God. Is God capable of doing what this person claimed that was impossible for God? They cannot prove anything about how the universe was created, now they can tell you how they THINK the universe begun. Which is just a theory. Here is an example of how an atheist/evolutionist arrives at a conclusion : A boy is riding his bike down the road. The poor boy is hit by a car. Two people are standing there. They both see the whole event. They both run around the corner to a pay phone to call 911. When they return the ambulance is just leaving with the little boy. That is all they know. They both go home and tell there families what happened. Story 1: This little boy was hit by a car, He was hit so hard. I'm positive that the poor little boy is dead. The little boy was killed and the ambulance took him away. Story 2: The little boy was hit by a car, he was hit very hard. I don't know if he died or not. The ambulance took him away. Story 1 is how an atheist/evolutionist arrives at fact. In reality neither person knows if the little boy died or not. Neither has proof that the little boy died. Yet story one is applying a theory to the story. The boy had to die because he was hit so hard by the car. So story one sounds like a fact, you have an eyewitness to the event. So it is now fact that the little boy died. He has convinced his entire family that the little boy is dead. When in reality the boy did not die, nor is either person a witness to ALL the events. Some may claim that the evidence for evolution is too strong. I ask you what evidence? To return to the debate/discussion I had with the evolutionist mentioned earlier; I wrote him and said: "when you have concrete evidence of evolution, that evolution has occurred; send this to me. If not then I assume our discussion is concluded. DO NOT send me what scientist "think" happened (THEORY). Send me facts, observed facts. No theories just facts. I have not heard back from him (Adrian Barnett) as of this writing. I probably never will. Due to the fact that he did not and does not have any strong evidence to prove that evolution has ever taken place. The atheist/evolutionist knows they have no evidence. How can someone apply a theory to some event that supposedly happened. When the event never happened. Without proof that evolution did in fact take place, the evolutionist, by applying a theory to a "non event" is showing his lack of intelligence, his ignorance about evidence, his/her ability to even weigh the evidence, and showing how he/she has to accept this (evolution) as fact due to no other alternatives. The alternative is Creation. By even entertaining the idea of creation, the evolutionist must first entertain the idea that God exist. If God exist then the Bible has to be true. If the Bible is true then... You get my point. Some people may think that I am not looking at all the available data, or that I am biased. I have a CD recorder and I have several CD's of information from both sides. I actually have more information on this subject from the pro-evolutionist view. I have spent hour upon hour reading this information. I admit I have learned quite a lot about biology, chemistry, astronomy etc... and there is no evidence for evolution. There is page after page of stating information that they claim is fact. However the most popular words in the evolutionist vocabulary are: supposed, it leans toward, we suspect, points toward, in theory, by applying the laws, it seems, we feel, it look like, and the list goes on. These are not facts. They are applying theories. They have come up with the theory and come hell or high water they are going to make the supposed facts fit the theory; at all cost. They even use dishonest tactics to sway people to the pro evolution side. Just read anything by Max or Hawkins or any pro evolution site and you will see my point vividly. This reminds me of a comedy routine I heard once. This is how evolutionist approach the evidence for creation. Two men are walking down a path, when they spot a pile of crap on the path. MAN1: what is that? MAN2: I don't know, it looks like crap. MAN1: smell it MAN2: (smells it) it smells like crap MAN1: touch it MAN2: (touches it) it feels like crap MAN1: taste it MAN2: (tasting) it taste like crap MAN1: aren't you glad we didn't step in it... So please before you accept evolution as fact, read carefully. You need to know the difference between fact and theory. You need to know the difference between reality and fantasy. You need to know when someone is applying an hypothesis to fantasy. Santa Claus is just as believable as evolution. See Debate Tips by Do-While Jones for more information on the evolution v. creation debate. It is highly recommended that you visit the site Science Against Evolution
|
Evolution is A
Lie (The Theory For Atheism)
